|
In response to the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Authorization
Act of 1991 and ongoing research into rollover and ejection
mitigation, NHTSA initiated a research program concerning occupant
protection in motor vehicle rollover crashes. NHTSA is addressing this
occupant protection issue from two perspectives–preventing a
rollover from occurring and protecting vehicle occupants during a
rollover, including reducing the likelihood of ejections.
Almost 60 percent
of rollover fatalities occur in the 10 percent of rollovers involving
either complete or partial ejection of vehicle occupants. Occupant
ejections occur either through structural failures, such as door
openings, or through window openings.
NHTSA is
evaluating the potential of improved door latches, side head air bags,
and advanced glazing systems (an automotive industry term for
transparent openings) to reduce occupant ejection. This report
evaluates the progress of advanced glazing research since NHTSA issued
its November 1995 report on occupant protection research to mitigate
ejection through window openings.
Each year on
average about 7,300 people are killed and 7,800 people are seriously
injured because of partial or complete ejection through glazing. Of
the fatalities, more than 4,400 are associated with vehicle rollovers
and the majority of these rollover victims were not using safety
belts. In fact, 98 percent of occupants completely ejected and killed
during rollover crashes were unbelted.
Advanced glazing
systems could save between 500 and 1,300 lives per year. These
estimates assume a national safety belt use rate of about 66 percent
(the average between 1992 and 1996) and a 20 to 51 percent range of
effectiveness for advanced glazing systems in preventing ejection.
Higher safety belt use rates directly reduce the estimated benefits of
advanced glazing systems. As of the end of 1998, the U.S. national
average seat belt use rate was 70 percent.
In conjunction
with Pilkington/Libbey-Owens-Ford, four types of advanced glazings
were identified for evaluation in this research program. These were a
non-HPR trilaminate, an HPR trilaminate, a bilaminate, and a
polycarbonate (rigid plastic). The General Motors C/K Pickup side door
window was selected as the platform for this work, since the
production version already included encapsulated vertical edges.
 |
The complete
1999 Report is available for viewing / printing in Adobe
Acrobat format (543kb). Click Here to
Download. |
 |
If you do not have
Acrobat Reader you can download a free copy. |
|