| Minnesota legislators
trampled over Gov. Jesse Ventura's veto of a bill allowing auto
insurers to limit the cost of glass repair based on "a
competitive price that is fair and reasonable within the local
industry." (see text of
Ventura's veto). The Senate voted 52-13, and the House voted
107-24 to override Ventura's veto of legislation that bans glass
dealers from offering rebates and give-away incentives. Insurers
have complained that those incentives drive up the costs of
claims, as well as premiums for all customers.
The law is the culmination of
several years' effort to reform Minnesota's glass-repair costs,
which according to many, are currently the highest in the country.
The previous law allows the state's insurance commissioner to
resolve price disputes through a market survey but leaves room for
costs to be higher than the market average, depending on the
individual case.
That has given smaller
glass-repair shops that charge higher rates room for argument when
insurance companies don't want to pay. They have been able to show
that their charges are legitimately higher because they have
costs, such as advertising, that they have to roll into their
repair charges in order to remain profitable.
According to the Alliance of
American Insurers (AAI), auto-repair costs account for 40 to 50
percent of auto insurance premium costs. Though glass repair is a
small portion of that percentage, the group says in Minnesota the
portion is much larger than in other states, which has driven up
the overall cost of auto insurance premiums.
Gov. Ventura vetoed the bill,
saying he disagreed with several of the arguments. He says
"no evidence exists that insurance premiums will decline if
this bill is enacted into law." Legislators, however, tended
to agree with insurance companies that argued that market
competition creates its own cost controls.
"If the free market is
allowed to operate, [glass-repair shops] that are competitive in
price will thrive," says an AAI spokesperson.
The new law also allows auto
insurers to refer policyholders to particular repair shops,
although they must make it clear in their policies that the
insured can select whatever glass-repair facility they want. They
also are required to tell consumers that they have a right to go
to any vendor of their choice.
|